ELECTORAL COLLEGE

Below are excerpts from a NY Time Opinion Piece

“Actually, the Electoral College Was a Pro-Slavery Ploy

That fact alone doesn’t mean it ought to be scrapped. But we should be clear about its disreputable origins.”

My claim is that the opinion is leveraged against the Electoral College in order to attempt to eliminate it by rooting it in a false origin story that its creation was to help slave owners and its elimination would be better for the country. Below this piece I will share some sentiments from other teachers I have worked with. Men like Akhil Reed Amar associate the Electoral College with Trump and the Electoral College with slavery so they can assert the popular slanderous narrative that Trump is racist, the Electoral College is racist and we need to do away with them both.

Many Americans are critical of the Electoral College, an attitude that seems to have intensified since Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election despite losing the popular vote. These critics often make two arguments: first, that electing the president by direct popular vote would be preferable in a democracy; and second, that the Electoral College has disreputable origins, having been put into the Constitution to protect the institution of slavery.

Amar asserts that many American’s are fed up with the Electoral College because Trump won the presidency. This claim is correct. Many people want to change the Electoral College because then the populace would win and more importantly, their candidate would win. It’s about wanting to win, not about fairness.

The second claim asserts that the Electoral College was put into the constitution with the intention of protecting slavery. I claim this is false and I will argue my side using this writers words.

“As James Madison made clear at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 in Philadelphia, the big political divide in America was not between big and small states; it was between North and South and was all about slavery. So, too, was the Electoral College at the founding, both in its original incarnation in 1787 and in the version later created by the 12th Amendment, which was adopted in 1804.”

“…if slaves could somehow be counted in an indirect system, maybe at a discount (say, three-fifths), well, that might sell in the South. Thus were planted the early seeds of an Electoral College system.”

The above quote notes how the Electoral College was not a benefit to the South unless there was a way to add more of a population, the 3/5 compromise, so the extremely small states could gain more electors. The Electoral College helps smaller states, but the South had such a small population that the benefits would have been for naught, lest they added slave votes and hence the 3/5 compromise. Many arguments for proportionality control were made.

James Madison argued for district voting in primaries where electors would vote in their respective state districts and also have secondary candidates to vote for. His proposal was a non-starter because of the imminent threat of this leading to a majority one party rule in close elections.

In other words, the lack of diversity woul have been brought upon by Madison’s proposal and ultimately create a single ruling party, one such argument against a direct popular vote for the president (we will discuss Madison’s later suggestions as well).

“Thanks to the three-fifths clause, slave states got extra votes in the House, just as in the Electoral College system that was finally adopted”

Here is the real “devil,” a later remark by Akhil Reed Amar, which purposely disregards the notion that the 3/5 compromise may be more to blame. He calls the Electoral College the “devil” and only mentions the three-fifths compromise as an additive to the devil; “Thanks to the three-fifths clause, slave states got extra votes in the House, just as in the Electoral College system that was finally adopted.” Amar puts the 3/5 compromise and the electoral college on the same footing seemingly claiming that the Electoral College and the compromise were in tandem racist constructions and the “devil.” Amar contradict himself in his next statement.

“The dominant political figure in antebellum America was the pro-slavery Andrew Jackson, who in 1829 proposed eliminating electors while retaining pro-slavery apportionment rules rooted in the three-fifths clause — in effect creating a system of pro-slavery electoral-vote counts without the need for electors themselves.”

The real devil rears his head. Jackson wanted to abolish the Electoral College and keep the 3/5 Compromise so pro-slavery votes would have more weight. The real friend of the America’s slave history was the 3/5 compromise and not the Electoral College. Then why blame the Electoral College and claim it was built to help slave owners?

“Today, of course, slavery no longer skews and stains our system — and maybe the Electoral College system should remain intact. The best argument in its favor is simply inertia: Any reforms might backfire, with unforeseen and adverse consequences. The Electoral College is the devil we know.”

“But we should not kid ourselves: This devil does indeed have devilish origins.”

Well the reason why he calls it the devil is because of his first lines “Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton.” This is the real reason we call this method the “devil” built in the fashion to help slave owners and sound the horns of popular vote. Call forth the mode of presidential election that Madison himself knew was a non-starter because many states would become unimportant and the possibility of one party domination.

The calls for eliminating the Electoral College rarely take into account Madison’s later proposals to amend the Electoral College that may create more popularly chosen candidates by instituting runoff elections and narrowing presidential candidates to better fit the voices of the people.

In essence, Madison may have just wanted a popular vote, believing majority voice is best, and unpopular opinion that even Madison himself had trouble with. He knew there were problems with popular vote for president and his proposals to alter the Electoral College seem to point towards the notion that Electoral College is not a pro-slavery draconian system, but a system abused by the 3/5 compromise and a system that works better than the other options thus far.

Calls for the elimination of and the false slave origin story of the Electoral College are rampant on school campuses and being an English and American Politics teacher, I am a minority that no other teachers wish to talk to about this subject. The two other political teachers here have little problem saying their opinion about why they don’t like the Electoral College but they never talk about the slave origins, and I retort, they drop that line of argument.

It seems that they do this because they may believe me to be inflexible, maybe perhaps they see that topic as so racially driven that they do not wish to even try and justify the other side; that is a problem with today’s PC movement.

The problem is that the left media associates such vile things to words that if you believe a topic or say a bad word, the left puts you into this box. The boo box. They put you in the boo box. If you argue for Trump BOOM racist in the boo box. If you claim the US is the best BOOM racist/xenophobe in the boo box. Even if you claim that China right now are just as bad as the Nazis were BOOM in the boo box. But sir, the Chinese are entering Muslims into reeducation programs, forcing abortions, controlling all media, feeding people tainted bat soup, and launching daily cyber-attacks against the US. Boo box.

The Electoral College slavery origin story is just another piece of the constitution that authoritarian fascistic leftist leaders wish to change. If you don’t like it, make it illegal or socially deplorable (Clinton literally called all Trump supporters deplorable). Crying babies of the left want to destroy what America was founded on and they are doing it one piece at a time.

          The stock market hit record highs and now it hit a low not seen since 2008. Goys giggling in China. Trump Trade war had America putting the strong arm of F-You capitalism around the mainland in a python choke. A well-known fact, pythons hate bats.

          Bat soup the culprit of the Corona Virus, despite the jailed doctor who claimed that that patient zero never visited the market, so how did bat soup cause the outbreak?

          Fuzzy body and charred crispy mammal wings seem more menacing that a level four security lab…well more menacing to the common house fly that can’t get enough of the new Dracula series or whatever PC show is trending on Netflix.

          Trump has been hiring every medical official possible to take charge and stop the virus from wiping out the elderly (half his constituent base) and when I say take charge, I mean charge forward like snow dogs. Mush Mush! Trump can be heard yelling as he literally bought reigns to sit in the oval office so he can use the metaphor with literal reign slapping.

          China is said to have been hit so hard their economy is bond to collapse like a sweat shop and the cries of 12year old workers will ring out through the cosmos, but this is a farce. With price controlling dictators who feed off the blood of freshly killed sharks in secret compounds riddled with opium dosed lotus foot concubines, the Chinese leaders can wait out any disaster and take up where they left off. Murder, death, disease are nothing to China, but what is a concern is America thinking for itself.

          Cut off the iPhone supply and America will wilt. Let the bounds of hell leak out of a level four lab is a great economic response.

怪蝙蝠

BLAME THE BAT!

          The old Chinese saying has escaped all scholars and Chinese leaders laugh, praise cats, kill Uighur Muslims, praise dragons, whip ceremonial Jesus statues and eat bat soup while making round eye jokes.

          China benefits from this catastrophe, and they know it and are quite pleased with it. Poor Trump just may lose if the economy goes into a recession and China and Russia will fund their fellow communist. Best hidden in plain sight and only Bernie’s wife and Putin knows about Bern-dogs hammer and sickle tattoo surrounding his anus.

          Tit for tat, bit for bat. Take a nibble US. China serves their vampire creatures in secure biological compounds and the non-Asian brain is confounded by a chess game riddled in weird diets, delicacies, science and above all, power hungry arm-less scaled leaders.

“No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffused and Virtue is preserved. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauched in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders.”

          Bernie bustle and hustles and the Democratic Party seems to be conceding that he has a chance of winning the nomination. But will Bernie have electors defect?

          People have been sacked and hated for defecting on electoral votes, but the DNC has already gone against Bernie once.

          Who else can the DNC choose? Klobuchar is as likeable as your Aunt whose name you somehow forget, but she pinches your cheeks and loves you anyways. PP Butt, Pete Buttigieg, will not be able to capture the black vote (since the black community does not take very kindly to his kind…Gays). Biden sniffs, sells American secrets to China, colludes with Ukraine and squirts blood out of his eye like a lizard (see picture below). Bloomberg is said to be less likeable than Trump, but also a spineless punk—I say spineless because Trump will back up his policies where Bloomberg will apologize for things like ‘stop and frisk.’ Bloomy may be more electable if he just touted the benefits of his program but then again, the Dems don’t like facts and statistics, but vote more off of feeling and the possibilities of a view.

          The natural progression of this dilemma is the abolition of the Electoral College. Trump cheated with Russia (not true, Russia was mad Obama was fighting a Proxy war through Ukraine an money through Burisma, Biden and Kolamoisky) and won the presidency even though Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, Bloomberg is abusing social media laws and could capture a large chunk of the electorate, and major cities with liberal beliefs are being put on a pedestal and the left thinks it’s time for their beliefs to reign supreme.

          The left has called small town peoples and farmers stupid and said they spread out because they hate people; unlike the liberal city dwellers. The push for direct democracy is on the rise. As the power of major cites grow and tech companies take the digital landscape, there is a greater voice. The argument has not changed much, but the power has.

          Media and technology have grown at a staggering rate and one claim to make media more secure is laws governing what can be said on all platforms. They claims that right wing extremists are the most dangerous thing in the US and their platform is all online. The rightwing are also the same people who live in these tiny towns, with unpopular beliefs that keep being aided by things like the Electoral College.

          Racism, words that cause harm, minority beliefs, majority rule are the top of the list arguments when tackling the Electoral College today. Many claim that the Electoral College was created by the framers because they feared majority rule. This is just a slice. There were many Whig Parliament loving twats that wanted power through majority rule (an easy thing to ride. All you have to do is lessen relative depravation to decrease social violence and have a more easily controlled society, easily controlled as in the body will not attack not riot violently against the government).

          Power hungry 51 percenters love majority rule for this reason, but this is not the only reason why the framers wanted Electoral College. There were concessions so minority voices were not trampled over. Not just minority voices, but minority states that could see their entire culture and rule of law disregarded in every presidential race.

          The people are also not the ones who see the presidential candidates behind closed doors. Our LinkedIn pages are much different than what we share in snapchat. The electors serve as a group of people who better know the candidates and can judge on qualifications that the populace may never see. Media is not uncovering every bit of people’s personality. CNN just settled a defamation a passing off doctored video as real, celebrities promoting fake stories where Nigerian immigrants are being given money to fake hate crimes on whiney gay black actors.  

Fox news article, “CNN to be sued for more than $250M over ‘vicious’ and ‘direct attacks’ on Covington Catholic student: lawyer””

          The US is imploding and there are many actors (the general term but Hollywood ones as well) that are speeding it along. Make America a direct democracy? HELL the DNC just changed the constitution to allow the impeachment of the president without actually passing an amendment. And now the left thinks they can just change the entire system, forgo the laws and precedent and we have news sources outright lying and paying the damaged hush money lest we all end up hanging ourselves via Clinton hands in a jail cell.

          The little guy is dying. The American ideal that any man or woman can rise to the ranks they aspire is being killed, and by what?

          The left claims its being killed because we are progressing into a more socialist world view that loves all and takes care of all.

          I believe this is happening because the left is killing restrictions. The left is fascistic pity. Anything that can die, anything that looks sad needs our attention. Help is given as a farce to implement a power dynamic that kills independence. Freedom is not in the collective and the left is a hive mind that views independent actors as a threat and they all must be destroyed.

          The values of our founding peoples in America were that of freedom, independence, justice and non-domination over non-interference.

          Non-domination is insuring the government does not have too much centralized control over states and independent actors and non-interference is the anarchistic side that states the government should not interfere with our lives at all. All that American people should ask for is not have the government arbitrarily infringe upon our rights.

          The left is abusing this last statement and they claim that our air, soil, water, noise pollution etc. are all an arbitrary abuse of power. President Trump is arbitrarily building a wall that hurts us all. The idea of gratitude is lost. The left is not gracious and thankful for the rights that our isolation brings. America has always seceded from other nations to protect our nation. Restrictive nature of independence is being split. The left believe we can have independence without restricting who comes into our country. The only thing they need to restrictive is our freedom to choose because the government will choose for us. Restrict our rights to be restrictive (closed borders, freedom to choose health insurance, restricting violence by owning guns to defend) so the government can allow whatever it will to keep people from having the freedom to find their own. The government will find it for you. The government has your biometric data logged, your facial structure a finger print, your location tracked every second, the control to turn off your car or make it start, the control to censure what you watch, who you love and the control to burn information at will and they want to control your ability to be able to defend yourself.

          Read the founding fathers. See why they chose an electoral college. See how many people wanted a parliament. America is not a Parliament despite the silly Whig minds. Our country is unique and the left want to destroy our differences and create a world of diversity of skin over a world of diversity of minds.

Anti-American news sources in the U.S. are what Roosevelt would call “muckrackers” and the facts about Huawei are proving Trump correct and NY Times, CNN, Bloomberg news, Yahoo news ect. to be slanderous Pro-Otherism propaganda streamlining self-hatred and boosting other countries power economically and socially.

          Pro-Otherism is the state of a country when peace is sought to a degree that causes certain actors to rally against their own nation and misuse facts to put themselves down and lift up others. Not to be confused with anti-tribalism: The anti-tribalism movement, or ATM, is “based on a cohesive and dynamic society where every person’s rights are protected regardless of tribe, clan, gender or political beliefs.”

          Anti-Tribalism is said to cater to other nations and cultures and to detract from American culture and downgrade the benefits of American culture and cause resentment of the US.

          Pro-otherism, PO (or pronounced prutherism), is an expansion of the criticism of ATM; PO is the active downgrading of criticism of other nations, irrelevant if criticism is necessary, criticizing any action that upsets someone else and pointing blame at one’s own nation. The effects are: resentment of one’s own nation, propping up and empowering other nations, allowing other nations to operate with impunity, it allows other nations to steal, fight and infiltrate one’s own nation and the response of said nation is always after damage has been dealt.

• NY Times claimed Huawei was being attacked by Trump on unproven grounds adding to his pressure campaign on China that is hurting the relationship betwwen the two nations.
• Yahoo news “Trump’s Huawei Attack Is a Serious Mistake Banning one of China’s most high-profile companies from U.S. networks makes sense. Putting it out of business does not” which a quote from Bloomberg and obviously on his news cite,
• CGTN News “U.S. President Donald Trump’s attack on Chinese tech giant Huawei is being opposed and criticized in both China and the United States,”
• The Verge:  “President Trump is once again playing the Nixonian greater madman by attacking China’s Huawei and ratcheting up tensions between the world’s two biggest economies”

Sadly the leftist followers take news one day at a time, always blame Trump and can’t see the bias or choose not to see it.

          Listening to the NY Times with liberal friend on our carpool to work and NY times says, “The U.S. government has charged Huawei and two of its subsidiaries with federal racketeering and conspiracy to steal trade secrets from American companies, a significant escalation in the Trump administration’s legal fight with the Chinese telecommunications company.”

          The NY Times still will rarely say anything direct about China stealing trade secrets, attacking our national security, but when they do, there is a disclaimer: Trump is causing the escalation and if he would be softer on China then we would be better off.

          Better off? Like when the Biden’s sold real-estate to Chinese government organization in America, or when his son joined a nuclear energy board in China, or when Hunter Biden let China steal (sold off) F-35 fighter jet blueprints, or when hunter Biden sold anti-vibration technology (very important for vehicles and military arms and vehicles) but hey, Trump is making China upset.

          The most telling part of Pro-otherism is part of the American softness. It’s the strong desire for people in America to not want to upset anyone else and in doing so, making a correct choice that upsets someone is viewed as wrong. This is evident all over America and is rising pathetic culture. I had a discussion the other day about the assassination of Soleimani, “That’s so fucking stupid that Trump murdered him. Like why?”

          Me: “Well he was part of the attack on our embassy, was planning more attacks and just killed and American contractor.”

          “So that means we go to war? There are other ways to solving this.”

          Me: “Well maybe you are right, but drilling holes in children’s legs and making the father watch while his wife is also tortured to death? That’s what Soleimani did. Kinda warrants death.”

          “I don’t fucking care I don’t want another fucking war; especially one caused by Trump.”

          Me: “Trump didn’t cause it, really?”

          “Yea, but he could have avoided another war. People are going to die because of Trump. He should just die and spare us all?”

          Me: “You wanna kill em?”

          “Yea I would fucking kill him because…no I’m not letting you bait me into another one of these conversations. Ok, I’m done.”

          If was want no reply ask rhetorical question or talk to a wall. The left consideres and response they disagree with to be “right-wing argument baiting.” A characteristic of the left is intolerance and they claim it’s not intolerance if its intolerance for intolerance. Logic is lost, Plato is back in his cave with his shadow and burning his toes on embers and blaming the fire. Education has lost its founding necessity, “the Socratic method.”

          Education now turns out unitary like-minded men and women that can only relate to others like them and not just relate, but they will only work and reason with others like them. Discourse is lost. The death of sentences and all people carry periods for books they hate. Information burners, agreement rapists and the growth of hate in the name of love. 

An article published on CNN by Sherisse Pham called:

US v. Huawei: 4 key takeaways from the indictments

Still considers this issue, an “escalating clash between Washington and Beijing over technology.” American Liberal news media thinks its good to be non-partisan when lloking ar other nations attacking the US, but perfectly fine to be partisan when attacking Americans.

Do A google search and type in “China” and the words “attacks US” and you will not see CNN, NY Times or any other major liberal news source on the front few pages.

1. Huawei’s founder lied to the FBI

Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei, who has played a prominent role in defending the company in recent weeks, repeatedly lied about its business dealings in Iran, US prosecutors say.

2. Bonuses for employees who stole trade secrets

US prosecutors say Huawei had a policy in place that gave bonuses to employees who successfully stole confidential information from competitors.

3. The ‘home’ team pressured colleagues to steal

Aside from a cash incentive, Huawei employees were allegedly under enormous pressure to obtain trade secrets.

4. US investigators accessed Meng Wanzhou’s electronic device

Prosecutors allege that Meng, the Huawei CFO, was part of a decade-long conspiracy to evade American sanctions on Iran and dupe Congress and US investigators.

Even with all of these very serious indicments, CNN calls

                The ignorance is thick…or is cheating obvious?

A milkshake melts in the sun, so how about we put it in the microwave? The Democrats change the rules by purposely setting up terrible situations and then blame the rules, constitution, laws etc. The Constitution states that a president can only be impeached for certain crimes and so they try to impeach him on other things and then complain that the Republicans rigged the Senate.

No difference with the Iowa caucus. A new app set up and trial date in real time and solutions made up on the spot. Hackers can attack internet voting, a known problem on both sides, yet the democrats tried to “modernize” the caucus with an app that failed; So, Nevada will use iPads; natural progression. I feel like people these days do not understand the word “progression.”

                Let’s be fair though, caucusing is a little dated, the Republicans have more of a voting system that has less issues, perhaps. But the solution is not an online voting system where fraud is more likely. White hat hackers have told the government about their ability to infiltrate voting systems in Texas, California, Kentucky and a few other states, and change votes in real time. Also Sctyl, the voting company in question (along with tenex) is owned by a foreign national of Spain.

                Despite the insecurities and flaws with online voting, the US is allowing online voting to occur in the wake of world changing election fraud via Russia and Ukraine and I’m sure China, North Korea and Iran have or want to join the part. Online system vulnerabilities are said to be combated by secure Google tech. Google forms will be used on the iPads by precinct chairs to calculate the votes on a “secure google web form” (Kaliegh Rogers). I worked with the registrar of voters and we precinct workers only get a single day of training, so I hope they vamp up the teaching methods for this one (but that’s unlikely because the training sessions are not paid and who wants more training without pay?).

                Google has the money, the tech and the power, but does it have the legitimacy, fairness and security? Google is involved in couple of lawsuits at the moment; one by the UK for google allegedly steering away customers from competitors in searches, by Tulsi Gabbard for deleting her ad account when her search results were number one in the Democratic presidential race, and also they are being sued by various conservative groups for account deletions and defamatory claims like being called a hate group (albeit some of these groups may be racist or hate filled groups, but not all of them) and there may be other lawsuits going on as well.

                We need the integrity of our elections to be our utmost priority! Said no one recently, despite complaints that Trump and Russia colluded to win the presidency. Climate change is more important! But if the elections are flawed, how do we get the appropriate legislation?

                Problem? Provide a half-assed solution that fails and then say, “the American voting systems is antiquated, flawed (racist too), and it needs to be changed! Just look at this disaster that the American way has cause. Oh, and Trump caused it as well and Republicans eehhhh military industrial complex, Russians, billionaires (not the owners of google or twitter, not Bloomberg, but the other guys).

SPEECH BY: Taika Waititi

FILM: “JOJO RABBIT”

Q. Congratulations. You began working on this film years ago when you were worried about kind of the direction things were going in this state of global affairs. We are now heading into a new election in America, we’ve had Brexit. I wonder how are you feeling about things now?
A. I have lived in a little bubble for six weeks to where any spare moment I would curl up under a table and go to sleep. So I haven’t really, like — I have no idea what is happening in the world. And it feels really weird to be, like — because I’m not usually like that. But, yeah. A lot of us making the film was in response to a resurgence of hate and intolerance and hate speech.  And here’s the thing, at the end of the war, there’s a very clear rule: If you are a Nazi, you went to jail. Now, the rules have changed a bit. If you are a Nazi, feel free to have a rally down in the town square and invite all your mates. So something’s changed and something’s not right. And we have forgotten the rules, I guess. And so I feel like this is the perfect time for a film like this. And I feel like the film has become more important and more relevant today, which is a sad thing, but also good for me.

          Another Nazi film. Nazi movements are said to be on the rise and white nationalism said to be on the rise and from here the claims have progressed to claim WS is the most dangerous thing the world is facing along side state sponsored Islamic terrorism. “First thing we need to do is recognize that it’s there, it’s a problem, it’s a threat ― as great a threat as Islamists,” a quote form Huffpost by Neiwart. The irony here is that Nazi’s have no state, not political footing (despite the claim that Trump is a Nazi) and there is not a country that has Nazi killings backed by the state. Islamic countries perform televised be-headings, hack American and European servers, Iran in 2019 captured a British oil tanker, Saudi Arabia oil refinery was attacked with a missile, Qasem Soleimani had Quds forces torture and murder and have plotted to attacks on the white house meetings. The Nazi’s today have nothing even a fraction of this type of terrorism. The hype is mainly propagated by anti-republican groups that want a liberal in the white house.  

          This would be bad. Just look at Canada and Trudeau. He was caught in black face and still won re-election. Why? Its leverage. He can be fired at any moment and now he is controlled by Islamic terrorists. Just the other day Omar Khadr was found by Ezra Levant flying on a Canadian plane over the US. How does this make Trudeau a terrorist?

          Trudeau allowed Kadhr, who pled guilty to killing U.S. Army Sergeant 1^st Class Christopher Speer, to fly in plane over the US. Obama actually shortened this man’s imprisonment in Guantanamo from 40 years to just 8. Now the man lives in Canada and was put on a no fly list and banned from the US land and air.

          Trudeau must have taken him off the no fly list. Bezos had his phone hacked by Prince bin Salman, probably found some nudes or pictures of black face, but something worse must have happened to Trudy. Trudy must have had pictures of like 15 year olds, or pictures of his actual slaves in Canada. That is why he allowed the Canadian government to give Khadr 10.5 million dollars in restitution. This terrorist killed an American and goes to jail for only 8 years and then is given 10.5 million dollars! Canada became a secret agent of Islamic Extremists.

Compare Islamic terrorism to Men marching with flags and only having white friends and the occasionally nut-job that goes and shoots up a mosque. This is the Nazi of today. Red laces (thing of the past), Hitler youth hair, they prefer khakis and collared shirts (Segal) now, and Swastika flags hidden under their bed for fear their roommate, girlfriend or mom may find it.

Taika Waititi is the part Russian Jew and part Maori. Let’s not forget Maori killed off every single indigenous member of the only other tribe in New Zealand, and we all know the sad lot of Jews throughout history. Quite a mix and quite a history, but this does not excuse his abhorrent claim that Nazi’s all need to be arrested. Let me explain.

Nazi’s during their actual regime were arrested after the war (lest they had money and fled to Argentina, or were bought up by NASA for being great scientists; the little man always dies) and the Nazi today is just a belief with little bearing on our world. If some little, or big, shit wants to play dress up in the street, he or she should have the right to spout whatever shit they want, as long as their words do not have any call to action which is illegal in our Constitution. My point is, freedom of expression and the ills it brings outweighs the damage stifling such expression would bring. Titi is using the same logic as those despicable Nazi’s. Arrest people for having what we consider to be a bad philosophy. Such a view creates a ruling class dominance and what ever party is at the head of a government can then determine what beliefs warrant arrest. We need freedom of expression lest we backslide to forms of inferior government which can allow for the rise of genocidal, racist or violent regimes/governments.

Titi wants free speech to die. He wants people of a racist mindset to be corralled up and thrown in jail. Awfully ironic for a Jew. A mindset should never land anyone in jail or in any sort of predicament. In 1968 Holloway and Hornstein founded the theory that “exposure to ‘bad’ news makes people less socially trusting and cooperative” (political science research methods). Make false claims, attack free speech and claim that we are all in danger by these white thugs and forgo the fact that America is under attack by Chinese cyber hackers every day and by Islamic Extremist plots every day, so the false claim that our great threat is White Nationals can eat at us all and ruin or cohesiveness.

One of our greatest threats is actually Hollywood and the media. Like Holloway and Hornstein claimed, bad news is dividing us and the media giants are only putting out news that is bad. Bad not just in accuracy, but they are promoting the doom by climate change and the doom by right wing terrorists.

          Watch out for the Nazi he might post a KEK meme and don’t worry about the Chinese militant, he might steal all our facial recognition software and be able to name every Human by face and plot for global control of the economy and purposely spread viruses to kill of all those darn worthless female Chinese and Hong Kong protesters.

Cannibalism—when blood is in the water liberals eat their own…but they don’t know where the blood has come from; it could be their own.  

THE BIG NEWS!!! BLOOMBERG ‘RACISTLY’ SUPPORTS HIS OLD IDEAS OF STOP AND FRISK

“Ninety-five percent of your murders, murderers and murder victims fit one M.O.,” Bloomberg is heard saying in one audio clip, reportedly recorded during a 2015 speech at the Aspen Institute. “You can just take the description, Xerox it and pass it out to all the cops. They are male, minorities, 16 to 25. That’s true in New York, that’s true in virtually every city. And that’s where the real crime is.”

          Bloomberg hasn’t been eaten yet, the Democratic Buffalo Bills have not yet eaten him and worn his skin—they are lotion-ing up his epidermis. The white billionaire is ripe and ready to flay. He will be an example to draw out the true socialist anti-fascist supporters. Like “The Hanging Stranger” in Phillip K Dicks short story, Bloomberg will be lynched in the streets for everyone to see and those who have pity will by attacked and brain washed and ultimately converted (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dXaBUiDlZM ).

          Hillary Clinton called black teens “super Predators,” but her team and party fought against the attacks, but the Dems are not doing the same for Bloomberg; Why? Cannibals don’t just eat every bit of flesh in sight, they are methodical chess players, not zombies.

          They set the pawns up and sacrifice the rook so the queen can kill the king. Bernie was sacrificed last year, and no better way to control someone than to show them they are powerless and then give them power; the reigns are installed, the brainwashing given an X-box controller and the candidate dances like an unborn Pinocchio. Is Bernie dead after his heart attack and are the Dems controlling him like Weekend at Bernie’s?

          Most believe that Bernie is independent and has no major influence dictating his decisions. This may be more true than most of the other candidates; However, he is a clipped eunuch. Not many know this. That is why Bernie let forceful BLM supporters take over his speech in downtown Seattle. One can say he is a nice guy and wanted to give BLM a voice. This is malarkey. Bernie has no testosterone and can only scream at stump speeches after he whiffs an enamel smelling salt carried in an ornate-crystal Victorian vile, reddening his eyes, skin and scratching his whinny voice. Perhaps why he had a heart attack.

          One of Bernie’s supporters is AOC, mainly because they share a penchant for socialism and blaming whites on mass shootings. Bloomberg coldly blamed male minorities for shootings and sadly if his statement just claimed “young males” are the problem and left out the other half of the fact, he would be championed as progressive white night. The left eats facts and men and shits out news. AOC knows her audience, I mean liberal overlords, and only blames white men claiming Trump “is directly responsible for what happened in El Paso.”  Or he quote ‘WHAT CONGRESS CAN DO ABOUT EXPLODING WHITE SUPREMACIST TERRORISM: PASS GUN SAFETY LAWS, NAME WS AS TERRORISM IN STATUTE, &MORE.”

Imagine the backlash is an official said, “What can congress do about black terrorists shooting up kids in major cities: Pass gun safety laws and name Black Gangs as terrorism statute and more.” This would be automatic removal from office faster than one can say, “lying Alexander Vindman.”

Poor Bloomy seemed destine to capsize after hitting a liberally placed iceBERG (love bad puns) calling out his successful stop and frisk—unsuccessfully meeting PC requirements however and falling prey to racist and/or dickhead cops. Ironically I thought the Dems had him in as a retainer horse sitting in the back of the pack sparring the whip until he got the call that the go-to-candidates have been Trumped. It’s always sad when a horse needs the shotgun, but campaigns come and die and when one leg is broken the jockey must support a healthy horse (Hillary is still hating Bernie though. Not sure if she is supporting someone else or if she knows her anger will get Bern more fuel to his fire—Pun-apocalypse coming at ya).

          Not to downplay terrorism, mass shooting nor white supremacy, but the amount of killings these days from fascist Hitler praising dingbats is not at an all-time high; there are more pressing murderers, but the culture of mass shootings is part of that white supremacy culture and Dave Chappelle is right; In a line of possible mass shooters, the white parents know that little shit is their little crazed domestic terrorist citing inspiration from Hitler, Spyro the Dragon and Nelson Mandela (The WS mass shooters really have shitty sporadic manifestos).

          Well jut forgo the few that don’t fit: Nikolas de la Cruz was Jewish (and a blasphemy of a name that means Nicolas of the Cross), Devin Patrick Kelly was a Bernie supporter, and the biggest mass shooting was by an Islamic extremist Omar Mateen in a gay Orlando night club.

          Meanwhile Ilhan Omar can still bad mouth Jews, whites and evade immigration violations and forged documents about being married to her brother (even liberal Snopes calls the claim “unproven” for from admitting it’s true, but wildly unopposed for a Snopes article). If you are on the right side in the right way, it doesn’t matter who you are, it only matter who you hate. It’s always been that way. Early America hated blacks, Indians and Mexicans, then the Irish and Asians then Germans and now its white people and the republican arm of hating Mexican and South American illegals.

                Hate on partisan lines and you will find your niche today, but hate based on peoples actions and you will find yourself writing blogs or getting fired from political jobs…

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/06/12/481768384/a-list-of-the-deadliest-mass-shootings-in-u-s-history

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ilhan-omar-marry-brother/

https://bipartisanreport.com/2019/08/06/aoc-blames-trump-for-mass-shootings-like-a-liberal-savior-gop-spirals/

https://time.com/3989917/black-lives-matter-protest-bernie-sanders-seattle/

BRAD PITT:
Wow. Thank you, this is incredible, really incredible. Thank you to the Academy for this honor of honors. They told me I only have 45 seconds up here, which is 45 seconds more than the Senate gave John Bolton this week. I’m thinking maybe Quentin does a movie about it, in the end the adults do the right thing. 

Brad Pitt calls an Oscar the “honor of honors.” I couldn’t agree any less. America has the most thriving movie industry in terms of numbers, but just because we sell the most has no bearing on the industry as a whole. Bradd Pitt (same problem I have with Chriss Pratt) may only have 45 seconds to speak, but he had to throw in a political dig that half the nation is wrong about.

He is angry Bolton didn’t get to be called into the trial, but neither did Hunter Biden, nor Eric Ciaramella (the leaker). Lets just allow Hollywood, the media, to forgo facts like how Trump’s call did not mention a “quid pro quo” and the Ukrainian officials did not even know there was a hold on the aid until a month later.

The lost 1.8 million dollars that Ukraine ‘lost’ in 2016 wasn’t a concern then, and now the the media glosses over the fact that the IMF was also withholding almost 4 billion in aid to Ukraine in 2019…Whaaat? Should the IMF be impeached too? Oh no, they were waiting for a “corroborating event” which turned out to be a seizure of PravatBank (the bank where that 1.8 million disappeared) and then the IMF handed over the 4 billion (Trump waited until after that event to release the aid as well). So even the IMF was concerned about the Biden’s and Kolamoisky (not directly stated, bu the IMF raided the same bank that Biden and the Obama administration trusted 4 years ago…).

Brad Pitt loves himself so much, he risked it all too bad mouth Trump (and not the person he would actually like to hate). He actually had 3 kids with Angelina and adopted the rest. Nothing more selfless than adopting kids from poor countries and then showing them off to the world like a charity one founded. Rumor is Brad doesn’t see his kids anymore, and he has taken more to the life style of Hollywood. He cashed in his brownie point and now it’s time for him to point some brownies aka fuck some ladies in the ass (to quote East Bound and Down).

I can see Angelina Jolie walking the slums of Cambodia dressed in black and white with a cigarette holder a la Cruella de Vil looking for the pick of the litter and having to hold back on buying them all. Like an inverted slave trade, rich whites buy poor kids of any race other than their own to boost their social economic score (the riches labor). Flouting her young inverted slaves, the limitations are nothing and these kids get to live life to the fullest and enjoy the best cocaine, molly and Ivy League schools. Nothing says social messiah like adopting kids of another race and letting them get hopped up in Adderall and getting full rides to Yale.

Pitt must have needed a life change. I mean most couples, after a few kids, if the wife still wants children, she becomes a cat lady. For her partner this can be good or bad. Having 4 cats scratch up everything and all the awkward photos and Christmas cards filled with soft ragdoll cats can be off putting to a man; even testosterone lowering; However, a wife that decides to adopted four kids and have three biological kids as well is a hell worse than Dante could have ever imagined.

I am married to a cat lady…but instead of cats she buys Cambodian strays and pretends like they are her own. Poor Brad can’t hate his wife, lest he wanted to look like a terrible man that hates a philanthropic Jolie who literally gives extravagant lives to lesser endowed children born into shit covered sidewalks. So Brad must hate someone and who safer than hating Trump. Working in academia, I can say if I chose to vocally hate Trump, I’m pretty sure I would have staff members throwing their panties down to bring me in and make me lick their boots. Nothing easier to a woman than a man who clips his own nuts.

Pitt is still in the mindset of Once Upon a Time where his character beat up Bruce Lee. After falling from a jump kick, old Pitt picked up 125lbs Bruce Lee and chucked him into a car. Take the easy fight that will make you feel good. Pitt was an animal in this movie; a wife killer, war hero, stunt man and also he never gave his fucking opinion. Nowhere in the movie does Pitt’s character babble like a fool and claim to be a political genius.

His character was so far from the actual actor, and we give credence to Pitt for acting, but no where do we stop and say, “Hey, Pitt’s character “Cliff” is flawed but amazing just like Pitt. So we should make sure to separate Pitt’s acting abilities from his unoriginal and unimportant political opinions.

https://www.glennbeck.com/theblaze-tv/ukraine-the-final-piecehttps://www.oscars.org/press/transcripts

The Oscars. We watch them now in order to dump on America, Trump, White People and the artificial insemination of cows.

          The best role went to Joaquin phoenix in his performance of a mentally deranged clown who has little grasp on reality, is constantly picked on, has a sad mother he takes care of and is feeling the negative effects of social deprivation (as in he feels he deserves more than he has; and in this movie, the Joker really does deserve more than life provides and Gurr’s theory comes true and we experience civil violence.

          In the movie the Joker was stepped on every day and he blamed everyone, everything and wanted people to tear it all down and laugh. At the Oscars Phoenix wants to tear down things as well…so let’s go over his speech.

          Ill break down the important speeches:

1. Joaquin Phoenix

Everyone expects him to be crazy and he did not disappoint despite starting off somewhat normal, “ But I think the greatest gift that it’s given me, and many of us in this room, is the opportunity to use our voice for the voiceless.” The voiceless, besides unborn babies, and anyone they disagree with politically, is actually not human but baby cows (hold tight).

His next line is Hollywoods anti-american anti-white propaganda in a nutshell, “ We’re talking about the fight against the belief that one nation, one people, one race, one gender, or one species has the right to dominate, control and use and exploit another with impunity.” The left loves to add things that are there to prove points. “one race” I’m sure he means that white elites control this country and they must be ameliorated but one gender? I thought there are like 26? Oh no, he means that men dominate. Yeaaaaa. One species? Yea humanity is comprised of…humans. Perhaps he means climate change will kill off everything except humans? I don’t know. And America is a hegemonic nation constantly keeping control through various means, sometimes taking poppy farms from Afghanistan, or building a wall, and often our country makes hard choices and occasionally the wrong choice.

It’s supposed to be one nation under God with liberty and justice for all. But according to this man, every gender needs the rights they made up, every animal should be given human rights or actually…actually I have no idea what he is talking about. Now I’m adding things. Sorry Joaquin Phoenix I didn’t mean to make your crazed rant into a crazed conspiracy.

“I think that we’ve become very disconnected from the natural world, and many of us, what we’re guilty of is an egocentric worldview, the belief that we’re the center of the universe.” Umm pot kettle? Humility is the best way to drive out the ills of egoism and selfishness. It seems there was a big lack of humility at the Oscars.

     Granted, I do believe the first half of his statement that many of us are “very disconnected from the natural world,” and those of us who provide solutions are often ridiculed; like Phoenix here, or Chris Pratt who took his son hunting (Chriss Pratt wasn’t just showing his son nature and how to hunt, but also how toxic masculinity is a myth; also because “Pratt” has two “t’s” I was to spell his first name “Chriss.”)

     His next line is a little tough to swallow, especially if you are lactose intolerant or vegan, “We go into the natural world and we plunder it for its resources. We feel entitled to artificially inseminate a cow and when she gives birth, we steal her baby, even though her cries of anguish are unmistakable. And then we take her milk that’s intended for her calf and we put it in our coffee and our cereal.”

     I do believe we plunder our natural world, our energy sources are not perfect and diversifying our energy sources I do believe is for the benefit of us all and our world; however, we need to earth’s resources. Plants need to be eaten, animals too you silly vegan (canine teeth are meant for meat), but he does have a point. China and India pollute too much and America needs to put these tyrannical nations under Americas thumb.

     I do hear you Joaquin. Forcing pregnancy on a cow is disturbing. Then taking (I say taking because stealing is more of a human concept and ownership for humans is based off of rights and ownership for animals is based off of power) the calf is also quite sad. Perhaps our meat and dairy industries need some regulation, or more human methods. We all saw those videos of workers beating, hitting, shocking and moving cows with tractors. Disturbing and cruel and no human should treat another living creature in such a way.

     Joaquin…you get partial lunacy and a pinch of good sense.

          Vrrriinnnanana. The sound of a chainsaw. Not a noise you want to hear in the dark, unless perhaps you are at a haunted house. Leather face was hideous and so he hid his face behind the flesh of innocent victims. Perhaps more admirable than rival mobs fighting for Ukrainian turf wars.

          Kolamoyski, majority owner of ProvatBank and Burisma, was accused of sending out goons to regain territory from rivals and apparently beheaded the opposition. Not an analogy. A guillotine is swift and relatively bloodless compared to a chainsaw; A chainsaw beheading: chip-chunk tossing scraps of bone, juicy marrow flinging from vertebrae, nuggets of neck muscles thrown to and fro, bits of flesh sticking to any surface it happens to land on. I hope the wielders were wearing the proper butcher gear, because that would be one hell of a stain.

The assholes were probably wearing white and later the next day tried to drop off their clothes at a dingy laundry mat that usually cleans money not clothes. Killers looking like Patrick Bateman screaming at Asian women to clean off the “cran-apple” stains. A delicious fruit juice, but also quite pretensions.

It’s a difficult situation to decipher. How did Obama allow this man to enter the US? Did Obama sell him chainsaws? Was all the claims against this man fraudulent? Why was his visa ban lifted just after Biden was put on the board at Burisma? Now the NY Times claim’s Kolomoisky is being attacked by the US and president Trump. Despite this claim, Kolomoisky wants to move to the US and I am sure, sooner or later, he will claim Trump is attacking him because he is a Jewish Billionaire.

Liberals love to call Trump racist while ignoring there are at least two liberal politicians in office who have photos of them in black face or KKK outfits. The racists love power, and now the secret freaks of hatred hide their true colors behind philanthropic love of all races and nature. True monsters never let you know they are. This isn’t Grendel’s world we live in, there is no Omnipotent dragon to tell monsters to accept themselves. Dragons lie on gold, liberals do to, but dragons have scales and Ukrainian Oligarchs saw of people’s heads. See the connection? It is predestined chaos and you have as much free will as gravity has.

Listen to the Dragon, for men are “counters, measurers, theory-makers,” and “they’d map out roads through Hell with their crackpottheories!” (Gardner).

So where did Kolamoyski get all this money? Being Tony Montana that’s how. Latvia accused him of money laundering, the UK accused him of money laundering through a shell company in London, 42 shell companies (all in  Cyprus) take the money form the US and all defrauded for an amount of almost 1.8 billion dollars…the same amount that the US gave to Ukraine, other Oligarchs accused him of murder and beheadings (which caused the US to ban his travel visa), Russia attacks Ukraine, Obama won’t send military aid to Ukraine, Hunter Biden goes to Ukraine, Kolamoyski gets visa by the US and travels to the White House, 1.8 goes to Ukraine, 1.8 billion goes into Kolamoyski’s bank, Ukraine’s prosecutor investigates Burisma for laundering money through Cyprus, the prosecutor is fired by Joe Biden, Crowdstrike involved with PravatBank, Kolamoyski builds an army in the area near Russia where he has been appointed Governor and Hunter Biden gets paid hundreds of thousands of dollars. Time line is wrong, but you get the point. Proxy war with US tax dollars? Trump tried to investigate this and then got impeached?

Side bar: Smee from peter pan looks like Kolomoisky…and they both are gold thieving pirates.

Mitt Romney sides with Democrats to impeach. Romney’s nieces huband was an attorney for some of Kolamoyski’s companies and was paid a generous $700,000 for his work over 2 years (a bit of a stretch, but that’s how money laundering works. Shell companies clean money and send the money to families, friends and associates of the main people involved).

All this dirt and the Democrats still claim that there was nothing at all bad about Hunter Biden and nothing bad about the US and Obama administrations dealings with Ukraine. As Glen Beck says, “Follow the Money.” Most of my information is from “Glen Beck Presents: Ukraine: The Final Piece” and Tyler O’Neil.

Word to the wise “seek gold and sit on it” (Gardner) because if you don’t, corrupt governments will launder it.

P.S. Kolomoyisky is spelled differently in about 5 different articles and I don’t know the truth about that man, not even his name.